Inhibition by simvastatin, but not pravastatin, of glucose‐induced cytosolic Ca2+ signalling and insulin secretion due to blockade of L‐type Ca2+ channels in rat islet β‐cells
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 126 (5) , 1205-1213
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0702397
Abstract
Hypercholesterolaemia often occurs in patients with type 2 diabetes, who therefore encounter administration of HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors. Alteration of pancreatic β‐cell function leading to an impaired insulin secretory response to glucose plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, it is important to examine the effects of HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors on β‐cell function. Cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) plays a central role in the regulation of β‐cell function. The present study examined the effects of HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors on the glucose‐induced [Ca2+]i signalling and insulin secretion in rat islet β‐cells. Simvastatin, a lipophilic HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitor, at 0.1–3 μg ml−1 concentration‐dependently inhibited the first phase increase and oscillation of [Ca2+]i induced by 8.3 mM glucose in single β‐cells. The less lipophilic inhibitor, simvastatin‐acid, inhibited the first phase [Ca2+]i increase but was two orders of magnitude less potent. The hydrophilic inhibitor, pravastatin (100 μg ml−1), was without effect on [Ca2+]i. Simvastatin (0.3 μg ml−1), more potently than simvastatin‐acid (30 μg ml−1), inhibited glucose‐induced insulin secretion from islets, whereas pravastatin (100 μg ml−1) had no effect. Whole‐cell patch clamp recordings demonstrated a reversible inhibition of the β‐cell L‐type Ca2+ channels by simvastatin, but not by pravastatin. Simvastatin also inhibited the [Ca2+]i increases by L‐arginine and KCl, agents that act via opening of L‐type Ca2+ channels. In conclusion, lipophilic HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors can inhibit glucose‐induced [Ca2+]i signalling and insulin secretion by blocking L‐type Ca2+ channels in β‐cells, and their inhibitory potencies parallel their lipophilicities. Precaution should be paid to these findings when HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors are used clinically, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes. British Journal of Pharmacology (1999) 126, 1205–1213; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702397Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lack of interaction between fluvastatin andoral nypoylycemie agents in healthy subjects and in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, gemfibrozil, and myopathyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Lovastatin Disrupts Early Events in Insulin Signaling: A Potential Mechanism of Lovastatins Anti-Mitogenic ActivityBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1994
- Cytosolic Ca2+ Increase and Cell Damage in L6 Rat Myoblasts by HMG-CoA Reductase InhibitorsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1994
- Effect of pravastatin treatment on glucose, insulin, and lipoprotein metabolism in patients with hypercholesterolemiaAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- Cytoplasmic Ca2+ oscillations in pancreatic ß-cellsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes, 1992
- Relative Lipophilicities, Solubilities, and Structure–Pharmacological Considerations of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) Reductase Inhibitors Pravastatin, Lovastatin, Mevastatin, and SimvastatinJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1991
- Efficacy and long-term adverse effect pattern of lovastatinThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Discovery, biochemistry and biology of lovastatinThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Impaired Pulsatile Secretion of Insulin in Relatives of Patients with Non-Insulin-Dependent DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988