Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 185 (4) , 906-910
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.117303
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic reviewBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999
- Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administrationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled TrialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Uterine contractility and induction of abortion in early pregnancy by misoprostol and mifepristoneThe Lancet, 1991
- A randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and meta-analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Superiority of the four-quadrant sum over the single-deepest-pocket technique in ultrasonographic identification of abnormal amniotic fluid volumesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990