An Economic Approach to the Psychology of Change: Amnesia, Inertia, and Impulsiveness
Preprint
- 1 June 2001
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper models how imperfect memory affects the optimal continuity of policies. We examine the choices of a player (individual or firm) who observes previous actions but cannot remember the rationale for these actions. In a stable environment, the player optimally responds to memory loss with excess inertia, defined as a higher probability of following old policies than would occur under full recall. In a volatile environment, the player can exhibit excess impulsiveness (i.e., be more prone to follow new information signals). The model provides a memory-loss explanation for some documented psychological biases, implies that inertia and organizational routines should be more important instable environments than in volatile ones, and provides other empirical implications relating memory and environmental variables to the continuity of decisions.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Have you Done for me Lately? Release of Information and Strategic Manipulation of MemoriesThe Economic Journal, 2007
- The psychology of sunk costPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- A Memory Based Model of Bounded RationalitySSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- A Reprise of Size and R & DThe Economic Journal, 1996
- Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memoryBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1996
- Memory of self-performed tasks: Self-performing during recognitionMemory & Cognition, 1994
- A Simple Model of Herd BehaviorThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- Sequential Sales, Learning, and CascadesThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- Memory for action events: The power of enactmentEducational Psychology Review, 1989
- Administrative Succession in Formal OrganizationsSocial Forces, 1960