A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI.
Open Access
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction
- Vol. 17 (11) , 2891-2896
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.11.2891
Abstract
Single embryo transfer (SET) is the sole strategy with which to reduce the incidence of twins following assisted reproductive technology (ART), but SET may increase the number of ART cycles needed per live-born child. Its cost-effectiveness compared with double embryo transfer (DET) is therefore unknown.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-effectiveness modelling of recombinant FSH versus urinary FSH in assisted reproduction techniques in the UKHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Cost-effectiveness of In Vitro FertilizationSeminars in Reproductive Medicine, 2001
- Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnanciesFertility and Sterility, 2000
- Prognostic factors in patients continuing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment and dropoutsFertility and Sterility, 1999
- Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductionHuman Reproduction, 1999
- Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who's afraid of single embryo transfer?Human Reproduction, 1998
- Predictive value of the results of a first in-vitro fertilization cycle on the outcome of subsequent cyclesHuman Reproduction, 1998
- Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques: Maternal and neonatal outcomesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- An Introduction to Markov Modelling for Economic EvaluationPharmacoEconomics, 1998
- The Economic Impact of Multiple-Gestation Pregnancies and the Contribution of Assisted-Reproduction Techniques to Their IncidenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994