Does the Time-of-Swing Method Give a Correct Value of the Newtonian Gravitational Constant?
- 9 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 75 (15) , 2796-2798
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.75.2796
Abstract
A standard way of measuring the Newtonian gravitational constant has been the time-of-swing method using a torsion pendulum. A key assumption is that the spring constant of the torsion fiber is independent of frequency. This is likely to be true to a good approximation if any damping present is proportional to velocity. However, recent work on the elasticity of flexure hinges suggests that typically the damping at low frequency is best modeled by including a frequency-independent imaginary component in the spring constant. In this case, the real part of the spring constant must vary, leading to an upward bias in a measurement of .
Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The gravitational force at mass separations from 0.6 m to 2.1 m and the precise measurement of GIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1995
- Newton's gravitational constant with uncertainty less than 100 ppmIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1995
- Stress-dependent damping in CuBe torsion and flexure suspensions at stresses up to 1.1 GPaPhysics Letters A, 1995
- The inverted pendulum as a probe of anelasticityReview of Scientific Instruments, 1994
- Materials problems in the construction of long-period pendulumsPhilosophical Magazine A, 1992
- Thermal noise in mechanical experimentsPhysical Review D, 1990
- The Newtonian Gravitational Constant: An index of measurementsMetrologia, 1987
- Redetermination of the Newtonian Gravitational ConstantPhysical Review Letters, 1982