Systematizing Research Findings on Collective Behavior and Social Movements
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Mobilization Journal in Mobilization: An International Quarterly
- Vol. 2 (1) , 1-20
- https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.2.1.ah58u30021302lx9
Abstract
If it is reasonable to think of collective behavior and social movement (CBSM) studies as the production, organization, and cumulation of research findings, why are there so few efforts to carry out the second and third of these tasks, those of organizing and cumulating findings? One answer is that very few CBSM scholars in fact think in such terms. Instead, many if not most order CBSM in terms of other principles and these principles compete among themselves and with the goals of systematizing and cumulating research findings. In this article, I explain six of these competing principles and contrast them with the goal of systematizing research findings. I then explain four strategic and six operational decisions faced by anyone who does want to organize and cumulate CBSM research.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Social Organization and Pathways of Commitment: Types of Communal Groups, Rational Choice Theory, and the Kanter ThesisAmerican Sociological Review, 1988