Saccadic eye movements to peripherally discriminated visual targets.

Abstract
Two experiments required subjects to identify a peripheral target embedded among nontarget stimuli and fixate it as quickly as possible with a single saccadic eye movement. Experiment 1 varied both the target distance and its angular position between trials; the mean oculomotor latency, the proportion of erroneous movements, and the proportion of (correct) movements followed by a corrective saccade all increased as a function of target distance. Experiment 2 held target distance constant (12.7 degrees) and used verbal instructions to manipulate the speed and accuracy of the subject's oculomotor performance between conditions. The speed/accuracy trade-off was similar for all subjects. The reduced uncertainty about target distance in Experiment 2 made each subject's oculomotor performance more efficient. Error trials not only included apparent perceptual errors (initial movements to nontarget stimuli) but also motor errors - that is, instances when the initial erroneous movement was followed, with an extremely short latency, by a large saccade to the target. The characteristics of these motor errors suggest that the saccade is not planned in terms of its amplitude and direction in retinal coordinates.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: