A Comparative Perspective on the Leninist Legacy in Eastern Europe
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 28 (2) , 239-274
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414095028002003
Abstract
This study begins with a comparison between post-Communist and other postauthoritarian party systems, demonstrating the greater importance of new parties in the formerly Leninist systems. It then discusses the effect on new parties of the weakness of prior interest group organization and sudden, as opposed to incremental, increases in political participation. The third section focuses on the institutional consequences of the differences noted in the first and second sections. It demonstrates the strong relationship between the interests of leaders of new parties and the kinds of democratic institutions created during transitions from authoritarianism. The study concludes with some speculations about the probable longer term effects of the distinctive features of the Leninist legacy.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peculiarities of post-communist politics: The case of PolandStudies in Comparative Communism, 1992
- Democratization and Constitutional Choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland 1989-91Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1992
- Institutional sources of corruption in BrazilThird World Quarterly, 1992
- A Democratic Legislature in the MakingComparative Political Studies, 1992
- The diary of decline: A case‐study of the disintegration of the party in one district in HungarySoviet Studies, 1991
- The Chilean elections of 1989Electoral Studies, 1990
- Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian RegimesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- The Brazilian elections of November 1986Electoral Studies, 1987
- The Development of Partisanship in New Democracies: The Case of SpainAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- An Organizational Approach to the Study of Political Culture in Marxist-Leninist SystemsAmerican Political Science Review, 1974