Decision making by general practitioners in diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract symptoms in women.
Open Access
- 24 April 1993
- Vol. 306 (6885) , 1103-1106
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6885.1103
Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To identify factors influencing decision making by general practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women. SETTING--Two suburban London general practices. SUBJECTS--Women presenting to their family doctor with lower urinary tract symptoms. DESIGN--After each consultation the doctor completed a questionnaire on presenting symptoms; clinical examination; investigations undertaken; presence of psychological, social, and menstrual problems; patients' requests for antibiotics; antibiotic prescribing; knowledge of the patient; attitude towards the consultation; and any other factors assisting in diagnosis and management. Finally, doctors predicted the presence or absence of clinically important bacteriuria. Each woman completed a demographic questionnaire, the 12 item general health questionnaire, and the modified menstrual distress questionnaire, after which each provided a clean catch midstream urine sample. Case notes were examined for information on previous reports of results of urine analysis. RESULTS--When the general practitioners did not know the patients well they were 4.5 times more likely to assume that there was a clinically important infection. When they knew the patient well, they were four times more likely to make a correct prediction of the test result and 12 times less likely to prescribe antibiotics. Doctors were five times more likely to predict the test result correctly in patients from social classes 1 and 2 and were six times more likely to prescribe antibiotics for the older women in the sample. CONCLUSIONS--In women presenting with urinary tract symptoms, these family practitioners seemed to take no particular regard of physical, psychological, or menstrual factors in making their assessments. They were most accurate in their prediction of the result of urine analysis and least likely to prescribe antibiotics when they had a good general knowledge of the patient. Which came first, the diagnosis or prescribing, is difficult to say and probably differed in individual cases. Doctors tended to be more conservative in their management of older women and those whom they knew less well.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study.BMJ, 1992
- Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations.BMJ, 1991
- A simple scoring system for evaluating symptoms, history and urine dipstick testing in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.1987
- Clinical judgment in the diagnosis and management of frequency and dysuria in general practice.BMJ, 1984
- A review of studies of decision-making in general practiceMedical Informatics, 1984
- A preliminary study of search procedures and patient management techniques in general practice.1980
- Clinical judgement and antibiotic use in general practice.BMJ, 1976
- PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS IN A DUTCH GENERAL-PRACTICE1976
- Typology of menstrual cycle symptomsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1969
- The Development of a Menstrual Distress QuestionnairePsychosomatic Medicine, 1968