Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade?
Preprint
- 1 February 2005
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
For more than forty years, the gravity equation has been a workhorse for cross-country empirical analyses of international trade flows and, in particular, the effects of free trade agreements (FTAs) on trade flows. However, the gravity equation is subject to the same econometric critique as earlier cross-industry studies of U.S. tariff and nontariff barriers and U.S. multilateral imports: Trade policy is not an exogenous variable. The authors address econometrically the endogeneity of FTAs using instrumental-variable (IV) techniques, control-function (CF) techniques, and panel-data techniques; IV and CF approaches do not adjust for endogeneity well, but a panel-data approach does. Accounting econometrically for the FTA variable's endogeneity yields striking empirical results: The effect of FTAs on trade flows is quintupled.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border PuzzleAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements: An Empirical AnalysisContributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2003
- On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity EquationJournal of Political Economy, 2002
- Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade AgreementsInternational Organization, 2002
- Protection for Sale: An Empirical InvestigationAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Estimating and Interpreting Models With Endogenous Treatment EffectsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1999
- Trade Barriers and Trade Flows across Countries and IndustriesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997
- Hungary looks to EU for guidanceNature, 1996
- Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 1993
- Economic Integration among Developed, Developing and Centrally Planned Economies: A Comparative AnalysisThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1985