Kinetic Characterization of the Chymotryptic Activity of the 20S Proteasome
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Biochemistry
- Vol. 35 (13) , 3899-3908
- https://doi.org/10.1021/bi952262x
Abstract
In this paper, we report kinetic studies for the chymotryptic activity of the 20S proteasome. Major observations include the following: (1) Reaction progress curves that are recorded at concentrations of Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC greater than about 40 μM are biphasic and characterized by initial velocities that decay by a first-order process to final, steady-state velocities. (2) Also at [Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC] > 40 μM, initial and steady-state velocities are smaller than predicted from simple, Michaelis−Menten kinetics. (3) The first-order rate constant for the approach to steady-state has a complex dependence on substrate concentration and decreases sigmoidally as substrate concentration increases. These results indicate that the 20S proteasome is a hysteretic enzyme and is subject to substrate inhibition. To explain these observations we propose a minimal kinetic model with two critical mechanistic features: (1) the 20S proteasome has two cooperative active sites for Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC and (2) there are two interconvertible conformers of active 20S proteasome. To probe this mechanism in greater detail, we explored the kinetic mechanism of inhibition of the 20S proteasome-catalyzed hydrolysis of Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC by the peptide aldehyde, Ac-Leu-Leu-Nle-H. Our studies reveal a nonlinear dependence of reciprocal steady-state velocity on inhibitor concentration (i.e., parabolic inhibition) as well as a nonlinear dependence of the apparent inhibitor dissociation constant on substrate concentration. Both of these observations are explained by binding of inhibitor at multiple sites on the enzyme. Taken together, the results of this study indicate that the 20S proteasome is a conformationally flexible protein that can adjust to the binding of ligands and that has multiple and cooperative active sites. These results support a view of the proteasome's substrate specificity in which (1) substrates are recognized and hydrolyzed by more than one active site; (2) each active site can bind substrates that possess a variety of P1 residues; and (3) the P1 residue plays a relatively minor role as a specificity determinant. Finally, we interpret the results of this study to suggest that, in vivo, the 20S proteasome requires conformational plasticity for its interactions with regulatory complexes and, after it has combined with appropriate regulatory complexes, to catalyze hydrolysis of proteins.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies on the activation by ATP of the 26 S proteasome complex from rat skeletal muscleBiochemical Journal, 1995
- Structural features of archaebacterial and eukaryotic proteasomesMolecular Biology Reports, 1995
- The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathwayCell, 1994
- Existence of a molecular ruler in proteasomes suggested by analysis of degradation productsFEBS Letters, 1994
- Complete reconstitution of conjugation and subsequent degradation of the tumor suppressor protein p53 by purified components of the ubiquitin proteolytic systemFEBS Letters, 1994
- The multicatalytic proteinase complex (proteasome): structure and conformational changes associated with changes in proteolytic activityBiochemical Journal, 1993
- Use of serine‐protease inhibitors as probes for the different proteolytic activities of the rat liver multicatalytic proteinase complexEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1992
- Role of Substrate in Reversible Activation of Proteasomes (Multi-Protease Complexes) by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate1The Journal of Biochemistry, 1989
- Deviations from Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The possibility of complicated curves for simple kinetic schemes and the computer fitting of experimental data for acetylcholinesterase, acid phosphatase, adenosine deaminase, arylsulphatase, benzylamine oxidase, chymotrypsin, fumarase, galactose dehydrogenase, β-galactosidase, lactate dehydrogenase, peroxidase and xanthine oxidaseBiochemical Journal, 1980
- Slow Transitions and Hysteretic Behavior in EnzymesAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1979