Reliability of Follow-up Assessments of Depressed Inpatients
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of General Psychiatry
- Vol. 43 (5) , 468-470
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050074008
Abstract
• Twenty-one depressed inpatients were followed up for six months after hospital admission. One rater assessed the patients at monthly intervals, and an independent rater assessed symptoms and treatment for the same period at the end of the six-month follow-up. Ratings of audiotapes of the monthly interviews by a third rater achieved excellent reliability. Fair to excellent agreement was also found between the monthly and six-month interviews. Reliability was lowest during the first month of the follow-up period. Unexpectedly, at the six-month interview more rather than fewer symptoms were reported for the most remote part of the follow-up interval. Our results suggest that at the six-month interview patients had reevaluated their functioning for the immediate postdischarge period.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Importance of Diagnostic Thresholds in Familial ClassificationArchives of General Psychiatry, 1985
- Four definitions of endogenous depression and the dexamethasone suppression testJournal of Affective Disorders, 1985
- The implications of DSM-III personality disorders for patients with major depressionJournal of Affective Disorders, 1984
- Outcome following ECT for primary unipolar depression: a test of newly proposed response predictorsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1984
- THE DEXAMETHASONE SUPPRESSION TEST AND ECT OUTCOME - A 6-MONTH FOLLOW-UP1983
- Initial 6-month follow-up of patients with major depressive disorderJournal of Affective Disorders, 1981
- Depressed OutpatientsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1981