Negative Consequences of Dichotomizing Continuous Predictor Variables
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Research
- Vol. 40 (3) , 366-371
- https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.366.19237
Abstract
Marketing researchers frequently split (dichotomize) continuous predictor variables into two groups, as with a median split, before performing data analysis. The practice is prevalent, but its effects are not well understood. In this article, the authors present historical results on the effects of dichotomization of normal predictor variables rederived in a regression context that may be more relevant to marketing researchers. The authors then present new results on the effect of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables with various nonnormal distributions and examine the effects of dichotomization on model specification and fit in multiple regression. The authors conclude that dichotomization has only negative consequences and should be avoided.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dichotomization, Partial Correlation, and Conditional IndependenceJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996
- Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance.Psychological Bulletin, 1993
- The Metric Quality of Ordered Categorical DataMarketing Science, 1989
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- THE THEORY OF CORRELATION BETWEEN TWO CONTINUOUS VARIABLES WHEN ONE IS DICHOTOMIZEDBiometrika, 1955
- Statistical procedures and their mathematical bases.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1940
- I. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. —VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurablePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1901