Cambrian Burgess Shale Animals Replicated in Clay Minerals
- 21 August 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 281 (5380) , 1173-1175
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5380.1173
Abstract
Although the evolutionary importance of the Burgess Shale is universally acknowledged, there is disagreement on the mode of preservation of the fossils after burial. Elemental mapping demonstrates that the relative abundance of elements varies between different anatomical features of the specimens. These differences reflect the compositions of the minerals that replicated the decaying organism, which were controlled by contrasts in tissue chemistry. Delicate morphological details are replicated in the elemental maps, showing that authigenic mineralization was fundamental to preserving these fossils, even though some organic remains are also present.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lingulid shell mediation in clay formationLethaia, 1996
- Fossil preservation in the Burgess Shale: ReplyLethaia, 1996
- Fossil preservation in the Burgess ShaleLethaia, 1996
- A giant conodont with preserved muscle tissue from the Upper Ordovician of South AfricaNature, 1995
- Articulated halkieriids from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland and their role in early protostome evolutionPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1995
- Decay ofBranchiostoma: implications for soft‐tissue preservation in conodonts and other primitive chordatesLethaia, 1993
- A Cambrian gilled lobopod from GreenlandNature, 1993
- Bacteria as nucleation sites for authigenic minerals in a metal-contaminated lake sedimentChemical Geology, 1987
- Metal fixation by bacterial cell wallsCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1985
- Smectite clay minerals: properties and usesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1984