The methods for handling missing data in clinical trials influence sample size requirements
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (5) , 447-453
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A 5-year randomized controlled, double-blind study of glycosaminoglycan polysulphuric acid complex (Rumalon®) as a structure modifying therapy in osteoarthritis of the hip and kneeOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2000
- Assessing Smallest Detectable Change Over Time in Continuous Structural Outcome Measures: Application to Radiological Change in Knee OsteoarthritisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Is conventional radiography suitable for evaluation of a disease-modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis?Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1997
- Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1996
- Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Radiographic progression of hospital referred osteoarthritis of the hip.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1993
- Binary methods for continuous outcomes: A parametric alternativeJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hipArthritis & Rheumatism, 1991
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Radiological Assessment of Osteo-ArthrosisAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1957