Choosing area based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in low birth weight and childhood lead poisoning: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US)
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- theory and-methods
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 57 (3) , 186-199
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.3.186
Abstract
Study objectives: To determine which area based socioeconomic measures can meaningfully be used, at which level of geography, to monitor socioeconomic inequalities in childhood health in the US. Design: Cross sectional analysis of birth certificate and childhood lead poisoning registry data, geocoded and linked to diverse area based socioeconomic measures that were generated at three geographical levels: census tract, block group, and ZIP code. Setting: Two US states: Massachusetts (1990 population=6 016 425) and Rhode Island (1990 population=1 003 464). Participants: All births born to mothers ages 15 to 55 years old who were residents of either Massachusetts (1989–1991; n=267 311) or Rhode Island (1987–1993; n=96 138), and all children ages 1 to 5 years residing in Rhode Island who were screened for lead levels between 1994 and 1996 (n=62 514 children, restricted to first test during the study period). Main results: Analyses of both the birth weight and lead data indicated that: (a) block group and tract socioeconomic measures performed similarly within and across both states, while ZIP code level measures tended to detect smaller effects; (b) measures pertaining to economic poverty detected stronger gradients than measures of education, occupation, and wealth; (c) results were similar for categories generated by quintiles and by a priori categorical cut off points; and (d) the area based socioeconomic measures yielded estimates of effect equal to or augmenting those detected, respectively, by individual level educational data for birth outcomes and by the area based housing measure recommended by the US government for monitoring childhood lead poisoning. Conclusions: Census tract or block group area based socioeconomic measures of economic deprivation could be meaningfully used in conjunction with US public health surveillance systems to enable or enhance monitoring of social inequalities in health in the United States.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multilevel Perspectives on Modeling Census DataEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2001
- Use of geographic information system technology to aid Health Department decision making about childhood lead poisoning prevention activities.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- GIS and Decision Making for Public Health AgenciesJournal of Public Health Management & Practice, 1999
- Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998
- On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic CharacteristicsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Census based deprivation indices: their weighting and validation.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- Deprivation indices: their interpretation and use in relation to health.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- Is enumeration district level an improvement on ward level analysis in studies of deprivation and health?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1995
- Misclassification of Social Disadvantage Based on Geographical Areas: Comparison of Postcode and Collector's District AnalysesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Women and social class: a methodological study comparing individual, household, and census measures as predictors of black/white differences in reproductive history.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1991