Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs.
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044826
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- To tell what we know or wait for Godot?Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Social science data and the APA: The Lockhart brief as a case in point.Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Child witnesses and the confrontation clause: The American Psychological Association brief in Maryland v. Craig..Law and Human Behavior, 1991
- Social science in Supreme Court criminal cases and briefs: The actual and potential contribution of social scientists as amici curiae.Law and Human Behavior, 1990
- Using psychology to control law: From deceptive advertising to criminal sentencing.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the CourtsPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Asserting scientific authority: Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights.American Psychologist, 1989
- Social science data and the Supreme Court: Lockhart as a case in point.American Psychologist, 1987
- Veils, values, and social responsibility.American Psychologist, 1982
- Toward Transformation in Social KnowledgePublished by Springer Nature ,1982