INFLORESCENCE ARCHITECTURE: HOW FLOWER NUMBER, ARRANGEMENT, AND PHENOLOGY AFFECT POLLINATION AND FRUIT‐SET
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 69 (4) , 585-594
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13295.x
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Science Foundation
- National Science Foundation (DEB 76–06717, GB‐28950)
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of Ant-mediated Pollen Dispersal in Diamorpha smallii (Crassulaceae)Systematic Botany, 1981
- Evolution of Dioecy in Flowering PlantsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1980
- Sexual strategies in plants IV. The distributions of gender in two monomorphic shrub populationsNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1980
- Sexual strategies in plants III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plantsNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1980
- Evolution towards dioecy in heterostylous populationsÖsterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 1979
- Experimental Evidence Concerning the Role of the Corpusculum in Asclepias PollinationSystematic Botany, 1978
- Darwin's Finches and Croton scouleri: An Analysis of the Consequences of Seed PredationBiotropica, 1976
- Comparative Carbon Balance and Reproductive Modes of Two Californian Aesculus SpeciesBotanical Gazette, 1974
- The classification of inflorescencesThe Botanical Review, 1944
- FLORAL EVOLUTION: WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE SYMPETALOUS DICOTYLEDONS.New Phytologist, 1912