Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair in a primary healthcare setting

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: Given the generally accepted poor outcome of inguinal hernia repair when using nylon darn, and the recent interest in low-tension mesh repair, an attempt was made to demonstrate the feasibility, outcome and patient perception of providing Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair, using local anaesthesia, wholly within the primary healthcare sector. Methods: A prospective study reviewed clinical outcome and patient perception in 100 adults referred with inguinal hernia only. No selection was made regarding age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status or previous repairs. Recurrence, pain, infection, return to full function and associated complications were assessed at 24 h, 1 and 6 weeks, and 1 year. Local Community Health Councils assessed patient perception. Results: In the first 100 patients (age range 21–83 (mean(s.d.) 60(14·7)) years; 58 of employable age; 92 men; ten recurrent hernias), no recurrences have occurred at 1 year. Infection rate was 3 per cent. Pain was maximal in the first 24–48 h (median visual analogue scale 5, range 0–10) and reduced rapidly (median 1) at 1 week. Mean time to return to work or full normal activity was 8 days. Some 85 operations were performed within 1 month of diagnosis. In all, 86 patients returned the patient satisfaction questionnaire and 98 per cent of these were ‘very pleased’ with the service. Conclusion: In highly motivated primary healthcare centres, inguinal hernia repair can be undertaken effectively, providing high patient satisfaction, minimal complications and low recurrence rates using the Lichtenstein technique.

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit: