Relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators and distance on gene flow in small Silene alba populations
- 7 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 169 (4) , 689-698
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01580.x
Abstract
Silene alba exists in natural metapopulations throughout its range and is visited by a suite of both diurnal and nocturnal pollinators. Pollen-mediated gene flow may help reduce genetic isolation of subpopulations. Here, we compared the relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators on pollen-mediated gene flow in subpopulations separated by two distance treatments. We established populations consisting of genetically marked individuals in an old field in Tennessee (USA). Electrophoretic examination of seedlings produced by plants exposed to nocturnal, diurnal and control pollinator treatments and separated by either 20 or 80 m allowed us to directly measure pollen-mediated gene flow. Gene flow was more common between populations separated by only 20 m. Nocturnal pollinators were responsible for most gene flow between populations, regardless of distance. Diurnal pollinators played only a small role in pollen-mediated gene flow. The results suggest that nocturnal pollinators are better than diurnal pollinators at moving pollen between small S. alba subpopulations. However, their effectiveness declines as the distance between subpopulations increases, making them relatively ineffective at moving genes between isolated subpopulations.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslandsBiological Conservation, 2002
- Long-distance pollinator flights and pollen dispersal between populations of Delphinium nuttallianumOecologia, 2001
- Genetic and demographic influences on population persistence: gene flow and genetic rescue in Silene albaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- Introduction: genetics, demography and the conservation of fragmented populationsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- Inbreeding Depression and Genetic Rescue in a Plant MetapopulationThe American Naturalist, 2000
- ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator InteractionsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1998
- Why does the flower of Lonicera japonica open at dusk?Canadian Journal of Botany, 1998
- The Ecological Consequences of Flowering Asynchrony in Monoecious Figs: A Simulation StudyEcology, 1990
- Pollination Affects Percent Biomass Allocated to Reproduction in Silene vulgaris (Bladder Campion)The American Naturalist, 1984
- Pollen Carried for Long Periods by ButterfliesOikos, 1982