The Statistical versus Clinical Significance Debate
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Vol. 25 (1) , 57-62
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00754.x
Abstract
There is general agreement that tests of statistical significance do not provide information about the clinical significance or practical importance of research results. Yet the concept of clinical significance has received little discussion or debate in the nursing literature. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast statistical and clinical significance, to provide an overview of the issues surrounding their uses as described in the methodological literature from a variety of disciplines, and to discuss some implications of these concepts for nursing research.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Meta-AnalysisNursing Research, 1989
- Significance test or effect size?Psychological Bulletin, 1988
- How significant is a significant difference? Problems with the measurement of magnitude of effect.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1987
- Family Study and Nursing ResearchImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1986
- Planning Research StudiesNursing Research, 1985
- Debunking Myths in Nursing Theory and ResearchImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1985
- Nursing Research: The Bridge to Excellence in PracticeImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1984