Rationing Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV/AIDS in Africa: Choices and Consequences
Open Access
- 20 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 2 (11) , e303
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020303
Abstract
The question facing African governments and societies, say Rosen and colleagues, is not whether to ration such therapy, but how to do so in a way that maximizes social welfare.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-Poor Countries: Illusions and RealitiesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Which Patients First? Setting Priorities for Antiretroviral Therapy Where Resources Are LimitedAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Fair process in patient selection for antiretroviral treatment in WHO's goal of 3 by 5The Lancet, 2005
- Designing Equitable Antiretroviral Allocation Strategies in Resource-Constrained CountriesPLoS Medicine, 2005
- Integrating HIV Prevention and Treatment: From Slogans to ImpactPLoS Medicine, 2005
- Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand sideHealth Policy and Planning, 2004
- Access to antiretroviral treatment in AfricaBMJ, 2004
- Adherence is not a barrier to successful antiretroviral therapy in South AfricaAIDS, 2003
- Women's barriers to HIV-1 testing and disclosure: Challenges for HIV-1 voluntary counselling and testingAIDS Care, 2001
- Non-price rationing and the choice of medical care providers in rural Cote d'IvoireJournal of Health Economics, 1987