The political rationalities of regionalism: APEC and the EU in comparative perspective
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Pacific Review
- Vol. 11 (3) , 311-336
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749808719260
Abstract
The essay is a comparative analysis of APEC and the EU, which looks at the particular sorts of economic orders these institutions are helping to create. It is argued that the two regions display some noteworthy differences that result from different approaches to the problem of economic governance. These differences reflect much more than the relative degree and level of regional institutionalization; they flow from different ‘political rationalities’ that are themselves a function of the very different liberal and illiberal polities in Europe and East Asia. Our key theoretical innovation is to use the framework of political rationality to explain different regional approaches to economic governance; more specifically we argue that the EU and the East Asian members of APEC may be understood as respectively subscribing to broadly conceived liberal and cameralist approaches to economic governance which are in turn reflected in the design of regional institutions.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- German capitalism: Does it exist? Can it survive?New Political Economy, 1997
- Agencies in the European Community - a step towards administrative integration in EuropeJournal of European Public Policy, 1997
- Civil society and other political possibilities in Southeast AsiaJournal of Contemporary Asia, 1997
- IntroductionThe Pacific Review, 1996
- Ideas, identity and policy coordination in the Asia‐PacificThe Pacific Review, 1994
- The Asia‐Pacific policy community in MalaysiaThe Pacific Review, 1994
- Singapore: The politics of regional definitionThe Pacific Review, 1994
- Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of GovernmentBritish Journal of Sociology, 1992
- Cameralism and the Science of GovernmentThe Journal of Modern History, 1984
- Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern LawLaw & Society Review, 1983