The Dimensionality of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
- Vol. 36 (1) , 21-39
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383920360102
Abstract
The paper investigates the dimensional structure of the six subtests in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test, using data from 10 different versions of the test administered to in all some 50,000 examinees. In the analysis several lisrel models of the factorial structure of the subtests are fitted and evaluated. The modelling shows a simple 1‐factor model to be inadequate for the data and two alternative, hierarchical, models are investigated. One of these includes 3 first‐order factors and 1 second‐order factor. The other model includes 2 orthogonal factors: a general factor (G) with relations to all 6 subtest, and a verbal‐educational factor (Gc') with relation to 4 subtests. On the basis of evaluations of estimated factor loadings and statistical criteria of fit it is, tentatively, concluded that the model with 2 orthogonal factors (G and Gc') is to be preferred.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hierarchical Organization of Cognitive Abilities: Restoring General Intelligence Through the Use of Linear Structural Relations (LISREL)Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1987
- A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilitiesIntelligence, 1984
- Some Cautions Concerning The Application Of Causal Modeling MethodsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1983
- On Intelligence IV: Toward a restoration of general intelligenceScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1981
- Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence.Psychological Review, 1968
- Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966
- Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963
- THE STRUCTURE OF THE MIND: A REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF FACTOR ANALYSISBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1949