Correlation of the Edinburgh Gait Score With the Gillette Gait Index, the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire, and Dimensionless Speed
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- cerebral palsy
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
- Vol. 27 (1) , 7-11
- https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e31802b7104
Abstract
This study examines the correlation of the Edinburgh Gait Score (EGS) with the Gillette Gait Index (GGI; formerly the Normalcy Index), the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire, and speed, all of which are used as measures of gait quality or function. Scores were computed for 58 subjects, all with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy. The correlation of the EGS with all of the other scores was found to be significant, with r2 ranging from 0.26 to 0.79. The strongest correlation was found with the GGI, which may reflect common features in the derivation of both of these scores, although the EGS was derived from observational gait analysis and the GGI from principal component analysis of variables from computerized 3-dimensional gait data. We conclude that the EGS shows good concurrent validity with alternative gait assessment scores.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Edinburgh Visual Gait Score for Use in Cerebral PalsyJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2003
- Use of the normalcy index for the evaluation of gait pathologyGait & Posture, 2003
- Normalisation of gait data in childrenGait & Posture, 2002
- Normalized Speed, Not Age, Characterizes Ground Reaction Force Patterns in 5-to 12-Year-Old Children Walking at Self-Selected SpeedsJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2001
- An index for quantifying deviations from normal gaitGait & Posture, 2000
- Reliability and Validity of the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire as an Outcome Measure in Children with Walking DisabilitiesJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2000
- Scaling gait data to body sizePublished by Elsevier ,1999
- The POSNA Pediatric Musculoskeletal Functional Health Questionnaire: Report on Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity to ChangeJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 1998