Comparison of femoral bleeding complications after coronary angiography versus percutaneous coronary intervention
Open Access
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 94 (3) , 361-363
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.036
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventionsAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devicesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Vascular complications and clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty with platelet IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral arterial accessEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular proceduresAmerican Heart Journal, 1999
- Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sitesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- A Randomized Trial of Vascular Hemostasis Techniques to Reduce Femoral Vascular Complications After Coronary InterventionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- A Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty by the Radial, Brachial and Femoral Approaches: The Access StudyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Radial Versus Femoral Approach for Diagnostic Coronary Angiography in Stable Angina PectorisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- What is the most effective vascular approach for a diagnostic cardiac catheterization? A randomized trial using the femoral, brachial or radial approachesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- An International Randomized Trial Comparing Four Thrombolytic Strategies for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993