Resolving the evolutionary paradox of genetic instability: a cost–benefit analysis of DNA repair in changing environments
- 19 March 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in FEBS Letters
- Vol. 563 (1-3) , 7-12
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(04)00282-0
Abstract
Loss of genetic stability is a critical phenomenon in cancer and antibiotic resistance, and the prevailing dogma is that unstable cells survive because instability provides adaptive mutations. Challenging this view, we have argued that genetic instability arises because DNA repair may be a counterproductive strategy in mutagenic environments. This paradoxical relationship has also been confirmed by explicit experiments, but the underlying evolutionary principles remain controversial. This paper aims to clarify the issue, and presents a model that explains genetic instability from the basic perspective of molecular evolution and information processing.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genomic instability — the engine of tumorigenesis?Nature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- The Directed Mutation Controversy in an Evolutionary ContextCritical Reviews in Microbiology, 2003
- ATR Regulates Fragile Site StabilityCell, 2002
- Mutator Bacteria as a Risk Factor in Treatment of Infectious DiseasesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Adaptive mutations, mutator DNA polymerases and genetic change strategies of pathogensCurrent Opinion in Microbiology, 2001
- Evolving responsively: adaptive mutationNature Reviews Genetics, 2001
- Genomic instability, DNA methylation, and natural selection in colorectal carcinogenesisSeminars in Cancer Biology, 1999
- Evolutionarily Stable Mutation RatesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1998
- p53, guardian of the genomeNature, 1992
- ORIGIN OF IMMUNE DIVERSITY: GENETIC VARIATION AND SELECTIONAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1985