Self-Reported Race and Genetic Admixture
- 26 January 2006
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 354 (4) , 421-422
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc052515
Abstract
The use of data on self-reported race in health research has been highly debated.1,2 For example, Burchard et al. recently argued that important information on disease susceptibility may be derived from the use of data on self-reported race,1 whereas Cooper et al.2 cited Wilson et al.,3 who argued that ethnic labels “are inaccurate representations of the inferred genetic clusters.” Cooper et al., however, ignored later work4 that identified limitations in the analyses of Wilson et al. — specifically, inappropriate classification of groups, the use of a suboptimal model for cluster identification, and reliance on only 39 microsatellite markers for cluster analyses. With larger numbers of markers, it was shown that genetically distinct groups can be almost completely inferred from self-reported race.5Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association StudiesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2005
- The Importance of Race and Ethnic Background in Biomedical Research and Clinical PracticeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Race and GenomicsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Population genetic structure of variable drug responseNature Genetics, 2001