The Rhetoric of Irrationality
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory & Psychology
- Vol. 1 (1) , 65-82
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391011005
Abstract
The popularity of the `biases and heuristics' literature is examined critically in terms of the rhetorical factors that have mediated widely published claims that human judgment abilities are poor and even irrational. The logic of the original experiments is examined as well as the factors that cause that logic to be ambiguous and the implications of the experiments to be misrepresented. Questionable use of evaluative language in scientific articles and secondary gains to outside authors who spread the bias message are also examined.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Empire of ChancePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature.American Psychologist, 1984
- Structuring decision problems and the ‘bias heuristic’Acta Psychologica, 1982
- Informing the Public about the Risks from Ionizing RadiationHealth Physics, 1981
- Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by HeuristicsLaw & Society Review, 1981
- On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 1973
- On the subjective probability of compound eventsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973
- Subjective probability: A judgment of representativenessCognitive Psychology, 1972
- Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- Strong InferenceScience, 1964