The Reliability and Accuracy of Time Series Model Identification
- 1 August 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 7 (4) , 551-560
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8300700408
Abstract
The most widely employed procedure for interrupted time series analysis consists of a two-step procedure: (1) determining the ARIMA model by examining the pattern of autocorrelations and partial autocorrelations; and (2) employing a general linear model solution after the effect of dependency has been removed. In order to determine the reliability and accuracy of model identification, 12 extensively trained subjects were each asked to identify 32 different computer generated time series. Six commonly occurring models were employed with different levels of dependency (high, medium, or low) and different numbers of data points (N=40 and N=100). The overall accuracy, 28%, was affected by the number of data points, the type of model, and the degree of dependency.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Box-Tiao Time Series Models for Impact AssessmentEvaluation Quarterly, 1979
- Lies, Damn Lies, and StatisticsEvaluation Quarterly, 1979
- Alternatives to Simonton's analyses of the interrupted and multiple-group time-series designs.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- The Effect of Massachusetts' Gun Control Law On Gun-Related Crimes in the City of BostonEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- Cross-sectional time-series experiments: Some suggested statistical analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 1977