The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: An Analysis of 2000 Incident Reports
Open Access
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
- Vol. 21 (5) , 520-528
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9302100507
Abstract
The Australian Patient Safety Foundation was formed in 1987; it was decided to set up and co-ordinate the Australian Incident Monitoring Study as a function of this Foundation; 90 hospitals and practices joined the study. Participating anaesthetists were invited to report, on an anonymous and voluntary basis, any unintended incident which reduced, or could have reduced, the safety margin for a patient. Any incident could be reported, not only those which were deemed “preventable” or were thought to involve human error. The Mark I AIMS form was developed which incorporated features and concepts from several other studies. All the incidents in this symposium were reported using this form, which contains general instructions to the reporter, key words and space for a narrative of the incident, structured sections for what happened (with subsections for circuitry incidents, circuitry involved, equipment involved, pharmacological incidents and airway incidents), why it happened (with subsections for factors contributing to the incident, factors minimising the incident and suggested corrective strategies), the type of anaesthesia and procedure, monitors in use, when and where the incident happened, the experience of the personnel involved, patient age and a classification of patient outcome. Enrolment, reporting and data-handling procedures are described. Data on patient outcome are presented; this is correlated with the stages at which the incident occurred and with the ASA status of the patients. The locations at which the incidents occurred and the types of procedures, the sets of incidents analysed in detail and a breakdown of the incidents due to drugs are also presented. The pattern and relative frequencies of the various categories of incidents are similar to those in “closed-claims” studies, suggesting that AIMS should provide information of relevance to those wishing to develop strategies to reduce the incidence and/or impact of incidents and accidents.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Problems with Ventilation: An Analysis of 2000 Incident ReportsAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1993
- Errors, Incidents and Accidents in Anaesthetic PracticeAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1993
- Oesophageal Intubation: An Analysis of 2000 Incident ReportsAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1993
- Which Monitor? An Analysis of 2000 Incident ReportsAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1993
- System Failure: An Analysis of 2000 Incident ReportsAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1993
- Cardiac Arrest—An Analysis of 2000 Incident ReportsAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1993
- Adverse Respiratory Events in Anesthesia: A Closed Claims AnalysisAnesthesiology, 1990
- An Analysis of Major Errors and Equipment Failures in Anesthesia ManagementAnesthesiology, 1984
- Preventable Anesthesia MishapsAnesthesiology, 1978
- The critical incident technique.Psychological Bulletin, 1954