Acupuncture Research: Where Are the Problems?
Open Access
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acupuncture in Medicine
- Vol. 12 (2) , 93-97
- https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.12.2.93
Abstract
In spite of its long history and widespread use, acupuncture has failed to demonstrate its clinical effectiveness convincingly. This article is aimed at discussing some of the problems related to acupuncture research that might have contributed to this overt discrepancy. These are the effects of investigator bias, the abundance of derivatives of traditional acupuncture, the lack of standardisation of treatment and selection of acupoints, and the difficulty in blinding the investigator, patient or therapist, as well as the problems related to the choice of an appropriate placebo. Such, mostly methodological difficulties, can and must be overcome if the controversy regarding the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture is to be solved.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Scrutinising the alternativesThe Lancet, 1993
- Unconventional Medicine in the United States -- Prevalence, Costs, and Patterns of UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Acupuncture and asthma: a review of controlled trials.Thorax, 1991
- Acupuncture Analgesia and Therapy - Part 1Acupuncture in Medicine, 1990
- Scientific Basis of AcupuncturePublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: PATIENTS, PRACTITIONERS, AND CONSULTATIONSThe Lancet, 1985
- PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE PAIN-RELIEVING EFFECTS OF HETEROTOPIC NOCICEPTIVE STIMULIBrain, 1984
- ACUPUNCTURE AND THE AGE OF UNREASONThe Lancet, 1984
- Physiological and psychological explanations for the mechanism of acupunture as a treatment for chronic painSocial Science & Medicine, 1984
- Neurochemical Basis of Acupuncture AnalgesiaAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1982