Microtubule Targeting of Substrate Contacts Promotes Their Relaxation and Dissociation
Open Access
- 6 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of cell biology
- Vol. 146 (5) , 1033-1044
- https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.1033
Abstract
We recently showed that substrate contact sites in living fibroblasts are specifically targeted by microtubules (Kaverina, I., K. Rottner, and J.V. Small. 1998. J. Cell Biol. 142:181–190). Evidence is now provided that microtubule contact targeting plays a role in the modulation of substrate contact dynamics. The results are derived from spreading and polarized goldfish fibroblasts in which microtubules and contact sites were simultaneously visualized using proteins conjugated with Cy-3, rhodamine, or green fluorescent protein. For cells allowed to spread in the presence of nocodazole the turnover of contacts was retarded, as compared with controls and adhesions that were retained under the cell body were dissociated after microtubule reassembly. In polarized cells, small focal complexes were found at the protruding cell front and larger adhesions, corresponding to focal adhesions, at the retracting flanks and rear. At retracting edges, multiple microtubule contact targeting preceded contact release and cell edge retraction. The same effect could be observed in spread cells, in which microtubules were allowed to reassemble after local disassembly by the application of nocodazole to one cell edge. At the protruding front of polarized cells, focal complexes were also targeted and as a result remained either unchanged in size or, more rarely, were disassembled. Conversely, when contact targeting at the cell front was prevented by freezing microtubule growth with 20 nM taxol and protrusion stimulated by the injection of constitutively active Rac, peripheral focal complexes became abnormally enlarged. We further found that the local application of inhibitors of myosin contractility to cell edges bearing focal adhesions induced the same contact dissociation and edge retraction as observed after microtubule targeting. Our data are consistent with a mechanism whereby microtubules deliver localized doses of relaxing signals to contact sites to retard or reverse their development. We propose that it is via this route that microtubules exert their well-established control on cell polarity.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A balance of signaling by Rho family small GTPases RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 coordinates cytoskeletal morphology but not cell survivalOncogene, 1999
- Phosphorylation- and Activation-independent Association of the Tyrosine Kinase Syk and the Tyrosine Kinase Substrates Cbl and Vav with Tubulin in B-CellsJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1999
- Actomyosin-based Retrograde Flow of Microtubules in the Lamella of Migrating Epithelial Cells Influences Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Turnover and Is Associated with Microtubule Breakage and TreadmillingThe Journal of cell biology, 1997
- Involvement of microtubules in the control of adhesion-dependent signal transductionPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions.The Journal of cell biology, 1996
- Myosin Drives Retrograde F-Actin Flow in Neuronal Growth ConesNeuron, 1996
- The Ras-related GTPase Rac1 Binds TubulinPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodiaCell, 1995
- Contact formation during fibroblast locomotion: involvement of membrane ruffles and microtubules.The Journal of cell biology, 1988
- Persistent, directional motility of cells and cytoplasmic fragments in the absence of microtubulesNature, 1984