Vandetanib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 10 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 30 (2) , 134-141
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.35.5040
Abstract
Purpose: There is no effective therapy for patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Vandetanib, a once-daily oral inhibitor of RET kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, has previously shown antitumor activity in a phase II study of patients with advanced hereditary MTC. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced MTC were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive vandetanib 300 mg/d or placebo. On objective disease progression, patients could elect to receive open-label vandetanib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), determined by independent central Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) assessments. Results: Between December 2006 and November 2007, 331 patients (mean age, 52 years; 90% sporadic; 95% metastatic) were randomly assigned to receive vandetanib (231) or placebo (100). At data cutoff (July 2009; median follow-up, 24 months), 37% of patients had progressed and 15% had died. The study met its primary objective of PFS prolongation with vandetanib versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.69; P < .001). Statistically significant advantages for vandetanib were also seen for objective response rate (P < .001), disease control rate (P = .001), and biochemical response (P < .001). Overall survival data were immature at data cutoff (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.65). A final survival analysis will take place when 50% of the patients have died. Common adverse events (any grade) occurred more frequently with vandetanib compared with placebo, including diarrhea (56% v 26%), rash (45% v 11%), nausea (33% v 16%), hypertension (32% v 5%), and headache (26% v 9%). Conclusion: Vandetanib demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in a phase III trial of patients with advanced MTC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00410761).Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase II Clinical Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Medullary Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Overexpression and activation of EGFR and VEGFR2 in medullary thyroid carcinomas is related to metastasisEndocrine-Related Cancer, 2010
- Vandetanib for the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hereditary Medullary Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of Motesanib in Patients With Progressive or Symptomatic, Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Management Guidelines of the American Thyroid AssociationThyroid®, 2009
- Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinomaCancer, 2006
- Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Options for Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Disease?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN 2A and FMTCHuman Molecular Genetics, 1993