Estimation of MERS-Coronavirus Reproductive Number and Case Fatality Rate for the Spring 2014 Saudi Arabia Outbreak: Insights from Publicly Available Data
Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- journal article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Currents
Abstract
The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was initially recognized as a source of severe respiratory illness and renal failure in 2012. Prior to 2014, MERS-CoV was mostly associated with sporadic cases of human illness, of presumed zoonotic origin, though chains of person-to-person transmission in the healthcare setting were reported. In spring 2014, large healthcare-associated outbreaks of MERS-CoV infection occurred in Jeddah and Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. To date the epidemiological information published by public health investigators in affected jurisdictions has been relatively limited. However, it is important that the global public health community have access to information on the basic epidemiological features of the outbreak to date, including the basic reproduction number (R0) and best estimates of case-fatality rates (CFR). We sought to address these gaps using a publicly available line listing of MERS-CoV cases. R0 was estimated using the incidence decay with exponential adjustment ("IDEA") method, while period-specific case fatality rates that incorporated non-attributed death data were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation. 707 cases were available for evaluation. 52% of cases were identified as primary, with the rest being secondary. IDEA model fits suggested a higher R0 in Jeddah (3.5-6.7) than in Riyadh (2.0-2.8); control parameters suggested more rapid reduction in transmission in the former city than the latter. The model accurately projected final size and end date of the Riyadh outbreak based on information available prior to the outbreak peak; for Jeddah, these projections were possible once the outbreak peaked. Overall case-fatality was 40%; depending on the timing of 171 deaths unlinked to case data, outbreak CFR could be higher, lower, or equivalent to pre-outbreak CFR. Notwithstanding imperfect data, inferences about MERS-CoV epidemiology important for public health preparedness are possible using publicly available data sources. The R0 estimated in Riyadh appears similar to that seen for SARS-CoV, but CFR appears higher, and indirect evidence suggests control activities ended these outbreaks. These data suggest this disease should be regarded with equal or greater concern than the related SARS-CoV.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of epidemiological inferences based on publicly available information: retrospective comparative analysis of line lists of human cases infected with influenza A(H7N9) in ChinaBMC Medicine, 2014
- Nuanced risk assessment for emerging infectious diseasesThe Lancet, 2014
- An IDEA for Short Term Outbreak Projection: Nearcasting Using the Basic Reproduction NumberPLOS ONE, 2013
- Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibilityThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2013
- Interhuman transmissibility of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: estimation of pandemic riskThe Lancet, 2013
- Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a Man with Pneumonia in Saudi ArabiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Severe respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus, in a patient transferred to the United Kingdom from the Middle East, September 2012Eurosurveillance, 2012
- What Do We Do with Missing Data? Some Options for Analysis of Incomplete DataAnnual Review of Public Health, 2004
- Transmission Dynamics and Control of Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeScience, 2003
- Transmission Dynamics of the Etiological Agent of SARS in Hong Kong: Impact of Public Health InterventionsScience, 2003