Are earthquakes predictable?
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Geophysical Journal International
- Vol. 131 (3) , 505-525
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb06595.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 90 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical aspects of Parkfield earthquake sequence and Parkfield prediction experimentTectonophysics, 1997
- Seismic moment‐frequency relation for shallow earthquakes: Regional comparisonJournal of Geophysical Research, 1997
- Centroid-moment tensor solutions for July–September 1995Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1996
- A few considerations for ascribing statistical significance to earthquake predictionsGeophysical Research Letters, 1996
- The VAN earthquake predictionsGeophysical Research Letters, 1996
- In the shadow of 1857‐the effect of the Great Ft. Tejon Earthquake on subsequent earthquakes in southern CaliforniaGeophysical Research Letters, 1996
- Evidence for a constant b‐value above magnitude 0 in the southern San Andreas, San Jacinto and San Miguel Fault Zones, and at the Long Valley Caldera, CaliforniaGeophysical Research Letters, 1994
- The precursory earthquake swarm in New Zealand: Hypothesis testsNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1993
- On the reliability of precursorsPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1989
- Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point ProcessesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988