Learning Curve and Preliminary Experience with da Vinci-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 80 (3) , 237-244
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000127333
Abstract
To report our initial experience in the treatment of prostate cancer with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), evaluating our results in terms of learning curve, postoperative outcomes and positive surgical margins. From April 2005 to February 2006, a single surgeon performed 41 RALP using the da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif., USA). Clinical and pathological data were collected prospectively and analyzed by a researcher from outside our clinic. The main perioperative parameters assessed were the following: operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate, intra- and postoperative complications, hospitalization time, catheterization time, and positive surgical margin rate. To evaluate the learning curve, patients were stratified into three groups: from case 1 to 10 (group 1), from case 11 to 20 (group 2), and from case 21 to 41 (group C). Median operative time was 210 min. Mean blood loss was 400 ml, with 9.8% of the patients receiving blood transfusions. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 2 cases (4.9%), while 4 postoperative complications (9.7%) were reported. Median times of hospitalization and catheterization were 7 days. Positive surgical margins were detected in 26.8% of the cases (6.9% among pT2 patients). Operative time (p < 0.001), blood loss (p = 0.02), transfusion rate (p = 0.006), and postoperative complication rates (p = 0.03) reduced along the learning curve. RALP is a feasible and reproducible technique, with a short learning curve and low perioperative complication rate. Even during the initial phase of the learning curve, good results were obtained with regard to postoperative complications and oncological outcome.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence from Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic ReviewEuropean Urology, 2007
- Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy – Critical Analysis of the ResultsEuropean Urology, 2006
- COMPARISON OF TRAINING MODALITIES FOR PERFORMING LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EXPERIENCE WITH 1,000 PATIENTSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: An assessment of its contemporary role in the surgical management of localized prostate cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Transperitoneal or Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A False Debate Over a Real ChallengeJournal of Urology, 2004
- Laparoscopic and Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Establishment of a Structured Program and Preliminary Analysis of OutcomesJournal of Urology, 2002
- LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH A REMOTE CONTROLLED ROBOTJournal of Urology, 2001
- Robotically‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2001
- Heilbronn Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998