Firm Size, Antitakeover Charter Amendments, and the Effect of State Antitakeover Legislation
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Managerial Finance
- Vol. 21 (5) , 35-51
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb018517
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of state antitakeover legislation on the market value of affected firms and considers the role that both acquisition attractiveness, as measured by firm size, and antitakeover amendments play in the market reaction. When separating the sample by size and by the presence of amendments, small firms display a negative reaction to the legislation, large firms show no reaction, firms without amendments react negatively, and there is a positive reaction for firms with amendments. When separating the sample on the basis of both dimensions, small firms without amendments, the most attractive acquisition targets, experience a significant, negative market response. Large firms with amendments, the least attractive group, are positively affected. The two intermediate groups are not significantly affected.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in Interstate Banking Laws: The Impact on Shareholder WealthThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- STATE ANTITAKEOVER LEGISLATION AND SHAREHOLDER WEALTHJournal of Financial Research, 1990
- The wealth effects of second-generation state takeover legislationJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- State Regulation of Takeovers and Shareholder Wealth: The Case of New York's 1985 Takeover StatutesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- Shark repellents and stock pricesJournal of Financial Economics, 1987
- Predicting takeover targetsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1986
- Editorial dataJournal of Financial Economics, 1985
- An Empirical Analysis of the Role of the Medium of Exchange in MergersThe Journal of Finance, 1983
- An empirical investigation of the impact of ‘antitakeover’ amendments on common stock pricesJournal of Financial Economics, 1983
- Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealthJournal of Financial Economics, 1983