Estimating coverage and power for genetic association studies using near-complete variation data
- 22 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Genetics
- Vol. 40 (7) , 841-843
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.180
Abstract
Tushar Bhangale, Mark Reider, and Deborah Nickerson report estimates of coverage and power by commercial genotyping arrays using a variation dataset for 76 genes resequenced as part of the SeattleSNPs program. Although studies suggest that SNPs derived from HapMap provide promising coverage and power for association studies, the lack of alternative variation datasets limits independent analysis. Using near-complete variation data for 76 genes resequenced in HapMap samples, we find that coverage of common variation by commercial genotyping arrays is substantially lower compared to the HapMap-based estimates. We quantify the power offered by these arrays for a range of disease models.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imputation-Based Analysis of Association Studies: Candidate Regions and Quantitative TraitsPLoS Genetics, 2007
- A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypesNature Genetics, 2007
- Transferability of tag SNPs in genetic association studies in multiple populationsNature Genetics, 2006
- Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studiesNature Genetics, 2006
- Evaluating and improving power in whole-genome association studies using fixed marker setsNature Genetics, 2006
- A haplotype map of the human genomeNature, 2005
- Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphismGenome Research, 2005
- Efficiency and power in genetic association studiesNature Genetics, 2005
- A comparison of tagging methods and their tagging spaceHuman Molecular Genetics, 2005
- Power Calculations for Genetic Association Studies Using Estimated Probability DistributionsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2002