Timeliness of Childhood Vaccinations in Kampala Uganda: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Open Access
- 23 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (4) , e35432
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035432
Abstract
Child survival is dependent on several factors including high vaccination coverage. Timely receipt of vaccines ensures optimal immune response to the vaccines. Yet timeliness is not usually emphasized in estimating population immunity. In addition to examining timeliness of the recommended Expanded Programme for Immunisation (EPI) vaccines, this paper identifies predictors of untimely vaccination among children aged 10 to 23 months in Kampala. In addition to the household survey interview questions, additional data sources for variables included data collection of child's weight and length. Vaccination dates were obtained from child health cards. Timeliness of vaccinations were assessed with Kaplan–Meier time-to-event analysis for each vaccine based on the following time ranges (lowest–highest target age): BCG (birth–8 weeks), polio 0 (birth–4 weeks), three polio and three pentavalent vaccines (4 weeks–2 months; 8 weeks–4 months; 12 weeks–6 months) and measles vaccine (38 weeks–12 months). Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with vaccination timeliness. About half of 821 children received all vaccines within the recommended time ranges (45.6%; 95% CI 39.8–51.2). Timely receipt of vaccinations was lowest for measles (67.5%; 95% CI 60.5–73.8) and highest for BCG vaccine (92.7%: 95% CI 88.1–95.6). For measles, 10.7% (95% CI 6.8–16.4) of the vaccinations were administered earlier than the recommended time. Vaccinations that were not received within the recommended age ranges were associated with increasing number of children per woman (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR); 1.84, 95% CI 1.29–2.64), non-delivery at health facilities (AHR 1.58, 95% CI 1.02–2.46), being unmarried (AHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.15–1.94) or being in the lowest wealth quintile (AHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11–1.72). Strategies to improve vaccination practices among the poorest, single, multiparous women and among mothers who do not deliver at health facilities are necessary to improve timeliness of vaccinations.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors affecting acceptance of complete immunization coverage of children under five years in rural BangladeshSalud Pública de México, 2010
- Timeliness and Completion Rate of Immunization among Nigerian Children Attending a Clinic-based Immunization ServiceJournal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 2009
- Timing of children's vaccinations in 45 low-income and middle-income countries: an analysis of survey dataThe Lancet, 2009
- Achieving measles control: lessons from the 2002-06 measles control strategy for UgandaHealth Policy and Planning, 2009
- When and Why Children Fall Behind with Vaccinations: Missed Visits and Missed Opportunities at Milestone AgesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009
- Timeliness of vaccination and its effects on fraction of vaccinated populationVaccine, 2008
- Immunization coverage and risk factors for failure to immunize within the Expanded Programme on Immunization in Kenya after introduction of new Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis b virus antigensBMC Public Health, 2006
- The MMR vaccination and autism controversy in United Kingdom 1998–2005: Inevitable community outrage or a failure of risk communication?Vaccine, 2006
- Economic Perspectives On Injecting Drug UsePublished by Emerald Publishing ,2005
- Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.1995