Corporate Serial Acquisitions: An Empirical Test of the Learning Hypothesis
- 31 August 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Recent empirical papers report a declining trend in the cumulative abnormal return (CAR) of acquirers during an M&A program. Does this necessarily imply that acquiring CEOs are infected by hubris and are not learning from previous mistakes? We first confirm the existence of this declining trend on average. However, we find a positive CAR trend for CEOs likely to be infected by hubris, which is significantly different from the negative trend found for CEOs who are more likely to be rational. We also explore the time between successive deals and find empirical evidence to suggest that many CEOs learn substantially during acquisition programs.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Will Multiple Acquirers Ever Learn? The US Evidence from Single versus Multiple AcquirersSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- What drives merger waves?Journal of Financial Economics, 2005
- What insiders know about future earnings and how they use it: Evidence from insider tradesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2003
- The market for corporate control: The scientific evidencePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995Strategic Management Journal, 2001
- Auctions of companiesEconomic Inquiry, 2001
- The Impact of Industry Classifications on Financial ResearchJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996
- Benefits of Control, Managerial Ownership, and the Stock Returns of Acquiring FirmsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1995
- Competitive DiffusionJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements: Payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistanceJournal of Financial Economics, 1987