Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: a case study and review of the literature
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 42 (1) , 171-182
- https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185874
Abstract
Accurate reporting of work-related conditions is necessary to monitor workplace health and safety, and to identify the interventions that are most needed. Reporting systems may be designed primarily for external agencies (OSHA or workers' compensation) or for the employer's own use. Under-reporting of workplace injuries and illnesses is common due to a variety of causes and influences. Based on previous reports, the authors were especially interested in the role of safety incentive programmes on under-reporting. Safety incentive programmes typically reward supervisors and employees for reducing workplace injury rates, and thus may unintentionally inhibit proper reporting. The authors describe a case study of several industrial facilities in order to illustrate the extent of under-reporting and the reasons for its occurrence. A questionnaire and interview survey was administered to 110 workers performing similar tasks and several managers, health, and safety personnel at each of three industrial facilities. Although less than 5% of workers had officially reported a work-related injury or illness during the past year, over 85% experienced work-related symptoms, 50% had persistent work-related problems, and 30% reported either lost time from work or work restrictions because of their ailment. Workers described several reasons for not reporting their injuries, including fear of reprisal, a belief that pain was an ordinary consequence of work activity or ageing, lack of management responsiveness after prior reports, and a desire not to lose their usual job. Interviews with management representatives revealed administrative and other barriers to reporting, stemming from their desire to attain a goal of no reported injuries, and misconceptions about requirements for recordability. The corporate and facility safety incentives appeared to have an indirect, but significant negative influence on the proper reporting of workplace injuries by workers. A variety of influences may contribute to under-reporting; because of under-reporting, worker surveys and symptom reports may provide more valuable and timely information on risks than recordable injury logs. Safety incentive programmes should be carefully designed to ensure that they provide a stimulus for safety-related changes, and to discourage under-reporting. A case-control study of similar establishments, or data before and after instituting safety incentives, would be required to more clearly establish the role of these programmes in under-reporting.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Injury and illness in the American workplace: A comparison of data sourcesAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1996
- Back pain and peripheral join pain in an industrial settingArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1996
- Accuracy of death certificate completion: the need for formalized physician trainingJAMA, 1996
- The Strain Index: A Proposed Method to Analyze Jobs For Risk of Distal Upper Extremity DisordersAihaj Journal, 1995
- Injury from assault in New Zealand: an increasing public health problemAustralian Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Do we really know how well our occupational accident prevention programs work?Safety Science, 1993
- Upper Extremity Impairment in Workers Performing Repetitive TasksPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992
- Work-Related Injuries in Athens County 1982 to 1986Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1992
- Low-Back Injuries in a Heavy Industry IISpine, 1991
- The use of incentives/feedback to enhance work place safety: A critique of the literatureJournal of Safety Research, 1989