Discourse: Definitions and contradictions
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- discourse in-social-psychology
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Philosophical Psychology
- Vol. 3 (2) , 187-204
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089008572998
Abstract
With the question “What is ‘discourse?’ “ as the starting point, this paper addresses ways of identifying particular discourses, and attends to how these discourses should be distinguished from texts. The emergence of discourse analysis within psychology, and the continuing influence of linguistic and post‐structuralist ideas on practitioners, provide the basis on which discourse‐analytic research can be developed fruitfully. This paper discusses the descriptive, analytic and educative functions of discourse analysis, and addresses the cultural and political questions which arise when discourse analysts reflect on their activity. Suggestions for an adequate definition of discourse are proposed and supported by seven criteria which should be adopted to identify discourses, and which attend to contradictions between and within them. Three additional criteria are then suggested to relate discourse analysis to wider political issues.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- From Of GrammatologyPublished by Duke University Press ,1992
- Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and BehaviourBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1988
- Accomplishing attitudes: Fact and evaluation in racist discourseText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 1988
- Cutting cakes: A study of psychologists’ social categorisationsPhilosophical Psychology, 1988
- The Politics of Mental HealthPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- How To Do Things With WordsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1975