Independent Pixel and Two-Dimensional Estimates of Landsat-Derived Cloud Field Albedo

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A theoretical study has been conducted on the effects of cloud horizontal inhomogeneity on cloud albedo bias. A two-dimensional (2D) version of the Spherical Harmonic Discrete Ordinate Method (SHDOM) is used to estimate the albedo bias of the plane-parallel (PP–IPA) and independent pixel (IPA–2D) approximations for a wide range of 2D cloud fields obtained from Landsat. They include single-layer trade cumulus, open and closed cell broken stratocumulus, and solid stratocumulus boundary layer cloud fields over ocean. Findings are presented on a variety of averaging scales and are summarized as a function of cloud fraction, mean cloud optical depth, cloud aspect ratio, standard deviation of optical depth, and the gamma function parameter ν (a measure of the width of the optical depth distribution). Biases are found to be small for small cloud fraction or mean optical depth, where the cloud fields under study behave linearly. They are large (up to 0.20 for PP–IPA bias, −0.12 for IPA–2D bias) for large... Abstract A theoretical study has been conducted on the effects of cloud horizontal inhomogeneity on cloud albedo bias. A two-dimensional (2D) version of the Spherical Harmonic Discrete Ordinate Method (SHDOM) is used to estimate the albedo bias of the plane-parallel (PP–IPA) and independent pixel (IPA–2D) approximations for a wide range of 2D cloud fields obtained from Landsat. They include single-layer trade cumulus, open and closed cell broken stratocumulus, and solid stratocumulus boundary layer cloud fields over ocean. Findings are presented on a variety of averaging scales and are summarized as a function of cloud fraction, mean cloud optical depth, cloud aspect ratio, standard deviation of optical depth, and the gamma function parameter ν (a measure of the width of the optical depth distribution). Biases are found to be small for small cloud fraction or mean optical depth, where the cloud fields under study behave linearly. They are large (up to 0.20 for PP–IPA bias, −0.12 for IPA–2D bias) for large...

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: