Colon Interposition for Esophageal Replacement
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 231 (2) , 173-178
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200002000-00004
Abstract
To describe the technique and results of an alternative colon interposition procedure in which the ascending and transverse colon is used as graft, but that still relies on the left colonic artery for blood supply. The standard procedure to obtain a left colon interposition graft requires ligation of the middle colic artery and mobilization of the left and right flexure. This approach carries a risk because preparation of the left flexure may damage arterial or venous collaterals located at this site that are crucial for graft perfusion. The authors modified the standard technique so that mobilization of the left flexure is no longer necessary. To obtain a colon interposition graft that is long enough, the ascending colon was included into the graft by ligating the middle and the right colic artery. The left colic artery remained the blood-supplying vessel. From January 1997 to June 1998, 15 patients underwent modified colon interposition with a cervical anastomosis (12 esophagectomies, 3 esophagogastrectomies). In all cases, intraoperative blood supply from the left colic artery to the proximal ascending colon was sufficient. After surgery, four major complications occurred (27%). Endoscopy demonstrated a vital graft in all patients. In one patient a leakage of the cervical anastomosis was observed. One patient died of herpes pneumonia. Postoperative artificial ventilation was required for an average of 2.8 ± 4.6 days, the average intensive care unit stay was 6.9±4.5 days, and the average total hospital stay was 24.1 ± 15.1 days. An intact left colic artery, including its collaterals at the splenic flexure, supplies sufficient blood to the proximal ascending colon after central ligation of the middle and right colic artery. Even without mobilization of the left flexure, a sufficient graft length can be obtained. Preliminary complication rates with the use of this technique for colon interposition are in the range of those found for the standard colon interposition technique. These modifications may represent an alternative to established procedures for creating a colon interposition graft.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Bowel Interposition for Esophageal Replacement: Twenty-Five–Year ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- The Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage After Total Gastrectomy with Local DecontaminationAnnals of Surgery, 1997
- Esophageal replacement by colon interpositionThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Indications, Surgical Technique, and Long-Term Functional Results of Colon Interposition or BypassAnnals of Surgery, 1988
- Colon Interposition for Advanced Nonmalignant Esophageal Stricture: Experience with 40 PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1981
- Long-segment Colon Substitution for the EsophagusAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- Colon interposition for benign esophageal diseaseThe American Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Colonic replacement after pharyngolaryngectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1967
- Colonic replacement of the oesophagus. Some observations on infarction and wound leakageBritish Journal of Surgery, 1967