An investigation of the reproducibility of face‐bow transfers
- 1 November 1983
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Vol. 10 (6) , 495-503
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb01473.x
Abstract
An investigation was conducted to determine the reproducibility of the position of a maxillary cast in two widely-used semi-adjustable articulators when a face-bow transfer was repeated ten times for the same individual. The results obtained with the Dentatus AEB, Whipmix Quickmount and Almore transfer bows were compared. The variations in cast position rarely exceeded +/- 1.0 mm in any of three planes of space and although the results suggested a ranking in accuracy of the three instruments, all were considered clinically acceptable. On the basis of the results observed, face-bow transfer appears to be a reliable clinical procedure and accuracy in the determination of reference locations is unlikely to be negated by subsequent transfer errors, provided that appropriate care is employed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The significance of errors in hinge axis locationThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1967
- The accuracy of an ear face-bowThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1966
- Variations in location of arbitrary and true hinge axis pointsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1961
- Hinge axesThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1960
- The transverse hinge axis: Real or imaginaryThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1959
- A clinical evaluation of the arcon concept of articulationThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1959
- A study of the arbitrary center and the kinematic center of rotation for face-bow mountingsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1957
- Factors of occlusion applicable to restorative dentistryThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1953
- Evaluation of the face-bowThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1952