Is New Keynesian Investment Theory Really “Keynesian”? Reflections on Fazzari and Variato
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
- Vol. 18 (3) , 333-357
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1996.11490076
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speculation-led economic development: a post-Keynesian interpretation of financial liberalization programmes in the Third WorldInternational Review of Applied Economics, 1995
- Comment on Do Informational Frictions Justify Federal Credit Programs?Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1994
- The Role of the State in Financial MarketsThe World Bank Economic Review, 1993
- The Neoclassical and a Post Keynesian Theory of InvestmentJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1992
- Neoclassical and Keynesian Approaches to the Theory of InvestmentJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1992
- Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian PerspectiveJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- Owner–Manager Conflict and Financial Theories of Investment Instability: A Critical Assessment of Keynes, Tobin, and MinskyJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1990
- Sensible Expectations and the Long-Run Non-Neutrality of MoneyJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1987
- Rational Expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision-Making ProcessesJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1982
- The General Theory of EmploymentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1937