Improved Radiologic Staging of Lung Cancer with 2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Registration
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
- Vol. 27 (4) , 479-484
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200307000-00004
Abstract
To determine if volumetric nonlinear registration or registration of thoracic computed tomography (CT) and 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) datasets changes the detection of mediastinal and hilar nodal disease in patients undergoing staging for lung cancer and if it has any impact on radiologic lung cancer staging. Computer-based image registration was performed on 45 clinical thoracic helical CT and FDG-PET scans of patients with lung cancer who were staged by mediastinoscopy and/or thoracotomy. Thoracic CT, FDG-PET, and registration datasets were each interpreted by 2 readers for the presence of metastatic nodal disease and were staged independently of each other. Results were compared with surgical pathologic findings. One hundred and thirty lymph node stations in the mediastinum and hila were evaluated each on CT, PET, and registration datasets. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, for detecting metastatic nodal disease for CT were 74%, 78%, 55%, 88%; for PET with CT side by side, 59% to 76%, 77% to 89%, 48% to 68%, and 84% to 91%; and for CT-PET registration, 71% to 76%, 89% to 96%, 70% to 86%, and 90% to 91%. Registration images were significantly more sensitive in detecting nodal disease over PET for 1 reader (P = 0.0156) and were more specific than PET (P = 0.0107 and 0.0017) in identifying the absence of mediastinal disease for both readers. Registration was significantly more accurate for staging when compared with PET for both readers (P = 0.002 and 0.035). Registration of CT and FDG-PET datasets significantly improved the specificity of detecting metastatic disease. In addition, registration improved the radiologic staging of lung cancer patients when compared with CT or FDG-PET alone.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Image Interpretation with Registered Thoracic CT and Positron Emission Tomography Data SetsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respirationEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2002
- PET-FDG scan enhances but does not replace preoperative surgical staging in non-small cell lung carcinomaEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Factors associated with false-positive staging of lung cancer by positron emission tomographyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- Physical characteristics of the ECAT EXACT3D positron tomographPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2000
- Accuracy and Clinical Impact of Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging with FDG–PET Imaging in Potentially Resectable Lung CancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung CancerChest, 1997
- Regional Lymph Node Classification for Lung Cancer StagingChest, 1997
- Mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: A prospective comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomographyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling.Radiology, 1992