Site segregation by species of Acanthocephala in fish, with special reference to eels,Anguilla anguilla

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Site specificity and distribution of 5 species offreshwater acanthocephalansAcanthocephalus clavula, A. lucii, A. anguillae, Pomphorhynchus laevisandEchinorhynchus trultaeand I marine species,E. gadi, were studied in the intestines of several species of fish, especiallyAnguilla anguilla. When data are presented in the conventional manner with results from all fish and all parasites in a sample combined, each species exhibited a preference for a particular region of the intestine which altered in some species in relation to host identity and sex and abundance of parasite. Each species could nevertheless inhabit most of the length of the intestine and there was a considerable degree of overlap in most cases between the distributions of species in the same host, but the mean position of each species differed significantly from that of any other and the species appeared to exhibit site segregation and resource partitioning along the length of the intestine. In individual fish, fidelity of site location and distribution is poor and may bear little or no relationship to the position and distribution of the parasites in the population as a whole, and it is concluded that the concepts of site specificity and segregation are most applicable at the population level. Mixed species infections are very rarely encountered in Britain since most freshwater localities contain, or are almost completely dominated by, only a single species of acanthocephalan. The results are discussed in relation to current ideas on the role of interspecific competition in determining site segregation and community structure of parasites. It appears that site specificity in fish acanthocephala is not related to the probability of mating, or site segregation to interspecific competition past or present. Acanthocephalan communities do not exist as such; the normal situation is chance assemblages, with vacant niches, little organization, few or no interactions and little fidelity between habitats.