Randomized Phase III Trial of Weekly Compared With Every-3-Weeks Paclitaxel for Metastatic Breast Cancer, With Trastuzumab for all HER-2 Overexpressors and Random Assignment to Trastuzumab or Not in HER-2 Nonoverexpressors: Final Results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9840
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (10) , 1642-1649
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.11.6699
Abstract
Purpose Phase II trials suggested that weekly paclitaxel might be more effective and less toxic than every-3-weeks administration for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 9840 was initiated to address this question. Subsequently trastuzumab was demonstrated to improve outcomes of paclitaxel therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)–positive patients, and was therefore incorporated. Because inhibition of HER-family signaling had potential efficacy even without HER-2 overexpression, we randomly assigned for trastuzumab in this population. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 80 mg/m2 weekly. After the first 171 patients, all HER-2–positive patients received trastuzumab; HER-2 nonoverexpressors were randomly assigned for trastuzumab, in addition to paclitaxel schedule. A total of 577 patients were treated on 9840. An additional 158 patients were included in analyses, for combined sample of 735. The primary end point was response rate (RR); secondary end points were time to progression (TTP), overall survival, and toxicity. Primary comparisons were between weekly versus every-3-weeks paclitaxel, and trastuzumab versus no trastuzumab in HER-2 nonoverexpressors. Results In the combined sample, weekly paclitaxel was superior to every-3-weeks administration: RR (42% v 29%, unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.75; P = .0004), TTP (median, 9 v 5 months; adjusted HR = 1.43; P < .0001), and survival (median, 24 v 12 months; adjusted HR = 1.28; P = .0092). For HER-2 nonoverexpressors, trastuzumab did not improve efficacy. Grade 3 neuropathy was more common with weekly dosing (24% v 12%; P = .0003). Conclusion Weekly paclitaxel is more effective than every-3-weeks administration for MBC. Trastuzumab did not improve efficacy for HER-2 nonoverexpressors. Neurotoxicity is a treatment-limiting toxicity for weekly paclitaxel.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which One Is Better: AIDS Related or HIV Associated?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Epoetin Versus Darbepoetin Conundrum CompromiseJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- 275 ORAL First-line bevacizumab and paclitaxel in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a randomized, phase III trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2100)European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 2005
- Trastuzumab plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Operable HER2-Positive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Weekly Paclitaxel Improves Pathologic Complete Remission in Operable Breast Cancer When Compared With Paclitaxel Once Every 3 WeeksJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Herceptin‐induced inhibition of ErbB2 signaling involves reduced phosphorylation of Akt but not endocytic down‐regulation of ErbB2International Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Relationship of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression to ErbB-2 Signaling Activity and Prognosis in Breast Cancer PatientsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Use of Chemotherapy plus a Monoclonal Antibody against HER2 for Metastatic Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Single-Dose Dexamethasone Paclitaxel PremedicationGynecologic Oncology, 1998
- Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trialsBiometrika, 1983